BEMM488 Entrepreneurship and Complete Sustainable Value Creation
Assignment Brief 2
2024-2025
Entrepreneurship and Complete Sustainable Value Creation
Assignment Brief 2
2024-2025
Module Assessment and Marking Criteria
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Throughout the tutorials and online there will be formative assessment, such as your contribution to group exercises and the pre-module task. Formative assessment is not graded and is an opportunity to get feedback on how you are progressing towards the learning outcomes of the module.
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT
Summative assessment is the assessment that results in a grade for the module. It is structured and follows a formal process. For this module there are two summative assessments.
Assignment 2: Final Report (Individual Assessment)
You will elaborate a personal entrepreneurial initiative for sustainable impact. During the module you have learnt about how entrepreneurial action can lead to sustainable impact, besides creating economic value. The principles, methods, and tools the module introduces are there to help you to elaborate your own impactful initiative, which is based on your available means.
To describe the doable, personal initiative for sustainable impact, you will hand-in a written document (max 3000 words). In the document, you will describe (I) what your personal initiative is all about, (ii) how your initiative is designed to make a sustainable impact, and (iii) how you have designed your initiative around Effectual principals. In addition, you will (iv) make a reflection about what you have learnt during the module about taking entrepreneurial action for sustainable impact, and what could be some concrete actions for you to take next to advance in this direction in your future.
Essential components of the written Word document:
1. My personal entrepreneurial initiative
2. Complete sustainable value creation
3. Effectual principles used in my initiative
4. Concrete actions for future personal development
References
% of Credit: 70%
Word count: 3000 Maximum
Assessment 2 Marking Criteria
|
Mark
|
(Fail/ Condonable Fail)
|
(Pass)
|
(Merit)
|
(Distinction)
|
|
Marking Criteria
|
<50
|
50-59
|
60-69
|
>70
|
|
Entrepreneurial Initiative
(20%)
|
The design of the
initiative does not
demonstrate an
adequate
understanding of
how value is created, delivered, and
captured.
|
The design of the
initiative demonstrates an adequate
understanding of how
value is created,
delivered, and captured.
|
The design of the
initiative
demonstrates a very good understanding of how value is
created, delivered, and captured.
|
The design of the
initiative demonstrates an excellent
understanding of how
value is created,
delivered, and captured.
|
|
Complete
Sustainable Value Creation
(30%)
|
The design of the
initiative does not
demonstrate an
adequate
understanding of
complete sustainable value creation.
|
The design of the
initiative demonstrates an adequate
understanding of
complete sustainable value creation.
|
The design of the
initiative
demonstrates a very good understanding of complete
sustainable value creation.
|
The design of the
initiative demonstrates an excellent
understanding of
complete sustainable value creation.
|
|
Effectual
Entrepreneurship (20%)
|
The design of the
initiative does not demonstrate an
adequate
understanding of
Effectual principles.
|
The design of the
initiative demonstrates an adequate
understanding of
Effectual principles.
|
The design of the
initiative
demonstrates a very good understanding of Effectual
principles.
|
The design of the
initiative demonstrates an excellent
understanding of
Effectual principles.
|
|
Concrete Actions for Future
Personal
Development (20%)
|
There are no clearly discernible concrete actions proposed and the quality of
reflection on future personal
development is low.
|
There are some specific concrete actions
proposed and the
quality of reflection on future personal
development is adequate.
|
There are a good
number of specific concrete actions
proposed and the quality of reflection on future personal development is
good.
|
There are very well
chosen specific concrete actions proposed and
the quality of reflection on future personal
development is excellent.
|
|
Report
(10%)
|
Report lacks clarity, flow, and/or
structure, also there are extensive
referencing issues.
|
Report has mostly
adequate clarity, flow and structure with few referencing issues.
|
Report has very good clarity, flow and
structure with no referencing issues.
|
Report has excellent clarity, flow and
structure with no referencing issues.
|